About the Firm
Founded in 1947, Holland & Hart is a full-service Am Law 200 firm with offices in eight states and in Washington, D.C. We deliver integrated legal solutions to regional, national, and international clients of all sizes in a diverse range of industries. For more information, visit www.hollandhart.com or on Twitter: @HollandHart.
Disclaimer
This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.
Privacy Policy
View our privacy policy.
Understanding the Child Care Contribution Tax Credit
/in Taxesby Kami Pomerantz
The Child Care Contribution Tax Credit (the “CCTC”) provides a valuable tax credit against a taxpayer’s Colorado state income tax. The credit equals 50% of the amount of a contribution made to a qualifying Colorado charitable organization that promotes child-care. At the end of August, the IRS issued proposed regulations amending Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-1. The proposed regulations would limit the deductibility for federal purposes of charitable donations that qualify for a state or local tax credit like the CCTC. While at a glance the proposed regulations seem to have a negative impact, in reality, for most taxpayers who itemize their federal deductions, the CCTC will remain an effective way to make charitable contributions at a substantially reduced net cost.
The CCTC applies to contributions of cash, (contributions of stock do not qualify) to Colorado institutions that support child care for children under 12 and to certain approved charities. Under prior law, these contributions were deductible as charitable contributions for federal and state income tax purposes. In addition, a taxpayer could credit 50% of the contribution against the taxpayer’s Colorado state income tax liability. These deductions and credits substantially reduced the after -tax cost of such donations to taxpayers. A taxpayer in the 35% federal tax bracket and subject to the 4.63% Colorado state income tax rate could make a charitable contribution of $30,000 for a net out of pocket cost of $8,847.
Read moreInheriting Vehicles – Sample Checklist Before You Go to the DMV
/in Administration of Estate, Court Procedures, Fiduciary Duties, Personal Representativeby Jody H. Hall, Paralegal
As a probate paralegal, I spend a decent amount of time helping families transfer assets and completing forms. One of the more common questions that I get is “What does one need to do and take to the DMV to transfer a vehicle title to the beneficiary?” I typically go through the steps and let the client know all of the information they should have handy; however recently I discovered an awesome checklist from the Denver DMV. While they state that this is specific to Denver County and you should check with the specific county, this is a really good starting point for all Colorado titles. Read more
Get your CLE Credit at the Upcoming 6th Annual Trust & Estate Litigation Symposium
/in UncategorizedEvery day, the Trust & Estate Litigation Practice Group at Holland & Hart addresses legal issues that impact fiduciaries and beneficiaries and litigates issues that arise in those relationships. Working to deal with conflicts arising from the transfer of wealth requires insight and vigilance. Our skillful group of problem solvers will share their experiences, perspectives, practice tips, and wisdom to arm you with the knowledge to help improve your fiduciary relationships.
Topics will include:
Agenda: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2018
7:30 – 8:00 a.m. – Breakfast and Registration
8:00 – 10:00 a.m. – Presentation Read more
No-Contest Clause Upheld by the Wyoming Supreme Court With No Probable Cause Exception
/in Administration of Estate, Administration of Trust, Estate Planning, Fiduciary Litigation, Testamentary Intent, Will & Trust Constructionby Carol Warnick
No-contest clauses (sometimes called in terrorem clauses) are extremely common in today’s litigious society. A no-contest clause essentially makes all gifts under the will or trust conditional upon not challenging the document. Many clients are concerned about a beneficiary (or a disinherited heir) contesting their estate planning documents, especially if the client wants to hold a beneficiary’s assets in trust or restrict or cut off a potential beneficiary’s idea of what they might inherit. In my practice, clients are asking for them much more frequently than when I first began doing estate planning in 1990. This is particularly true with blended families where there may be a greater potential for disagreement among the various beneficiaries or between those who are favored by the plan and those who feel they were wronged by the dispositive terms. Trust and estate litigation is frequently driven by emotion, and many times the beneficiary’s complaints are not rational, thereby leading to protracted litigation and waste of the trust or estate’s assets. This is what the settlor is typically trying to avoid by the use of a co-contest clause. Read more
Litigation Victory
/in Administration of Estate, Administration of Trust, Fiduciary Litigation, Testamentary Intent, Will & Trust Constructionby Carol Warnick
The Holland & Hart Trust and Estate Litigation Group announces a big litigation victory. After a three-day trial, ruling from the bench, the court upheld our trustee client’s interpretation of a trust in defeating a claim that there was a contract to make a trust. In addition, we were able to enforce a no contest clause against the beneficiary bringing the claim and prevailed in enforcing a fee-shifting provision contained in the document. Congratulations to our team of litigators and our Persuasion Strategies consultant who combined to bring home this victory!
Your Secret’s Safe with Your Estate Planning Attorney, Or Is It?
/in Administration of Estate, Administration of Trust, Estate Planning, Fiduciary Litigation, Personal Representative, Testamentary Intent, Trustee, Will & Trust Constructionby Lauren A. Morris
A mother visits her attorney to discuss her estate plan. She expects that the conversations she has with her attorney will be forever confidential and privileged, particularly when she wishes to guard uncomfortable realities from her family members, such as her desire to disinherit her son. Upon the mother’s death, her disinherited son figures out that he is in fact removed from her estate plan. Here we have the classic scenario in which a snubbed child wants to challenge the provisions in the estate plan to prove that the decedent did not intentionally fail to provide for him. But with the mother now deceased, how do we determine her actual intent?
The mother’s estate planning attorney is in the next best position to ascertain her intent, but doesn’t the attorney’s duty of confidentiality to the mother prevent him from disclosing any information he may have regarding her intent, specifically when the mother thought she was speaking in confidence? Read more