Fiduciary Law Blog Archive
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Blog - Latest News

Understanding the Child Care Contribution Tax Credit

December 17, 2018/in Taxes

by Kami Pomerantz

The Child Care Contribution Tax Credit (the “CCTC”) provides a valuable tax credit against a taxpayer’s Colorado state income tax.  The credit equals 50% of the amount of a contribution made to a qualifying Colorado charitable organization that promotes child-care.  At the end of August, the IRS issued proposed regulations amending Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-1.  The proposed regulations would limit the deductibility for federal purposes of charitable donations that qualify for a state or local tax credit like the CCTC.  While at a glance the proposed regulations seem to have a negative impact, in reality, for most taxpayers who itemize their federal deductions, the CCTC will remain an effective way to make charitable contributions at a substantially reduced net cost.

The CCTC applies to contributions of cash, (contributions of stock do not qualify) to Colorado institutions that support child care for children under 12 and to certain approved charities.  Under prior law, these contributions were deductible as charitable contributions for federal and state income tax purposes.  In addition, a taxpayer could credit 50% of the contribution against the taxpayer’s Colorado state income tax liability.  These deductions and credits substantially reduced the after -tax cost of such donations to taxpayers.  A taxpayer in the 35% federal tax bracket and subject to the 4.63% Colorado state income tax rate could make a charitable contribution of $30,000 for a net out of pocket cost of $8,847.

At the end of 2017, Congress passed Pub. L. 115-97 which made substantial changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.  One of the changes involved the deductibility of payments made to state and local governments for taxes.  Before the 2017 Tax Act, an individual could deduct the full amount of the taxpayer’s state income tax liability from the taxpayer’s gross income for federal income tax purposes.  The 2017 Tax Act capped the deduction of state and local taxes for individuals for federal income tax purposes at$10,000.

Because of this cap, the federal government was concerned that some states might try to lessen the impact of the loss of state and local tax deductions by “transforming” state income taxes into charitable deductions.  To combat this, the IRS developed the proposed amendments to Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-1.  These amendments state that a taxpayer must reduce the taxpayer’s federal charitable deduction for donations to charity by the amount of any state or local tax credit that the taxpayer expects to receive.  Thus, in the case of the CCTC, a taxpayer’s federal tax charitable deduction for the donation will be reduced by 50% of the donation, the amount of the CCTC. There is one exception to the proposed rule.  A taxpayer does not have to reduce his federal charitable deduction if the state or local tax credit for the donation does not exceed 15% of the taxpayer’s payment. 

Although the proposed amendments appear to be reducing a taxpayer’s federal charitable deduction, taxpayers who have already reached the$10,000 maximum deduction for state and local taxes will not experience a substantial negative impact from the proposed regulations.  Under the proposed amendments to the Treasury Regulations, the cost of a $30,000 donation eligible for the CCTC for a taxpayer who (a) itemizes his or her federal income tax deductions, (b) is subject to the 35% federal tax bracket and (c) has reached the $10,000 cap on deduction of state and local taxes is $9,055.50 (slightly more than under prior law) as illustrated below.

1. Donation Amount $30,000  
2. Federal Tax Deduction Savings ($5,250) ((30,000-15,000(tax credit)) *.35)
3. State Tax Saving from Deduction ($694.50) (30,000*.0463*.5)
4. State Tax Savings from Credit ($15,000) (30,000 *.5)
6. Net Cost to Taxpayer $9,055.50 (30,000-20,944.5)

Although many taxpayers will not be negatively impacted by the proposed regulations, there are three caveats to the above.  First, under the 2017 Tax Act and regardless of the proposed amendments to Treasury Reg. 1.170A-1, the loss of the deduction of paid state and local taxes above the $10,000 cap will require many taxpayers to pay more federal income taxes. Second, taxpayers who itemize deductions for federal income tax purposes and who have not reached the $10,000 cap for payment of state and local taxes will lose some benefit from the CCTC for federal tax purposes due to the new regulations.  Finally, for taxpayers who do not itemize their deductions for federal income tax purposes, there is no federal income tax benefit related to the CCTC, even though there may be substantial savings for state income tax purposes.

In summary the CCTC remains a valuable tool for providing large benefits to qualifying charities at a substantially reduced out of pocket cost to most taxpayers.  As always, however, donors should consult with their tax professionals to confirm the precise impact of the recent tax law changes to their circumstances. 

Republished with permission from The Denver Foundation GIVE Magazine. This article originally appeared in the Winter 2018 issue.

https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2018-12-17 10:18:362018-12-17 10:18:36Understanding the Child Care Contribution Tax Credit

Fiduciary Law Blog Archive

NOTE: This blog is no longer an active blog. For the foreseeable future, we will not be contributing content. However, we continue to offer the already published content as a service to anyone interested in the topics Holland & Hart’s Trust & Estates team covered here.

Trust & Estate Litigation Practice

Holland & Hart has one of the premiere trust and estate litigation practices in the Mountain West Region. We offer legal services in the areas of probate, trust, and fiduciary litigation, and provide customized solutions to fiduciaries with the intent of avoiding future litigation. Our team represents trustees, financial institutions, trust companies, beneficiaries, creditors, agents under powers of attorney, and individuals in probate, trust, and fiduciary disputes. As part of a full-service law firm, we can also provide streamlined coordination with attorneys in other related disciplines to provide maximum efficiency and effectiveness. Click here to read more.

Categories

  • Administration Expenses
  • Administration of Estate
  • Administration of Trust
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Arbitration
  • Bonds
  • Charities
  • Conservator
  • Court Procedures
  • Elder Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Discretion
  • Fiduciary Duties
  • Fiduciary Litigation
  • Guardian
  • Legislation
  • Life Insurance
  • Mediation
  • Personal Representative
  • Powers of Attorney
  • Removal of Fiduciary
  • Settlement of Controversies
  • Surcharge of Fiduciary
  • Taxes
  • Testamentary Capacity
  • Testamentary Intent
  • Trust Litigation
  • Trustee
  • Uncategorized
  • Undue Influence
  • Will & Trust Construction

Archives

Blog Authors

Desta Asfaw
Margot Edwards
Jody Hall
Richard Kiely
Andrew LeMieux
Megan Meyers
Peter O’Brien
Kami Pomerantz
Helen Rogers
Carol Warnick

About the Firm

Holland & Hart is a full-service law firm with locations in 14 offices. Throughout the Mountain West, from coast to coast and beyond, Holland & Hart provides clients with sharp legal counsel from a vantage like no other. For more information, visit www.hollandhart.com or on Twitter: @HollandHart.

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright - Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
Link to: Inheriting Vehicles – Sample Checklist Before You Go to the DMV Link to: Inheriting Vehicles – Sample Checklist Before You Go to the DMV Inheriting Vehicles – Sample Checklist Before You Go to the DMV Link to: Ethical Issues Surrounding Pro Se Litigants Link to: Ethical Issues Surrounding Pro Se Litigants Ethical Issues Surrounding Pro Se Litigants
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top