Fiduciary Law Blog Archive
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Blog - Latest News

Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty: Which Interest is Best?

September 11, 2017/in Administration of Trust, Fiduciary Discretion, Fiduciary Duties, Fiduciary Litigation, Trustee

by Matthew Skotak

The term “fiduciary” can be considered a vague term that encompasses many different people and several different relationships.  Under Colorado law, a fiduciary includes, without limitation, a trustee of any trust, a personal representative, guardian, conservator, receiver, partner, agent, or “any other person acting in a fiduciary capacity for any person, trust, or estate.” Colo. Rev. Stat. § 15-1-103(2).  It is within this context that we examine a fiduciary’s duty of loyalty and how best to uphold that duty.

In the context of a trust, and as stated in the Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 2, a fiduciary relationship with respect to property arises out of the manifestation of an intention to create the fiduciary relationship and subjects the trustee “to equitable duties to deal with the property for the benefit of another person.”  From this relationship stems several inherent and implied fiduciary duties.  Generally, the fiduciary duties applicable to a trustee are: the duty of loyalty, the duty to exercise care and skill in managing the trust assets and administering the trust, and the duty to remain impartial to all beneficiaries.  

The duty of loyalty, perhaps the broadest of the fiduciary duties, has been described as “inherent” in the trust relationship.  George Gleason Bogert & George Taylor Bogert, The Law of Trusts and Trustees § 543 (2d rev. ed. 1980).  The duty of loyalty requires a trustee “to administer the trust solely in the interest of the beneficiary.” Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 170(1).  This “sole interest” rule is widely regarded as the most fundamental rule of trust law.  See Austin W. Scott & William F. Fratcher, Scott on Trusts § 170 (4th ed. 1987).  This sole interest rule prohibits the trustee from placing himself in a position where his personal interest conflicts or possibly may conflict with the interests of the beneficiary. Under the duty of loyalty, the trustee must refrain from engaging in any act of self-dealing or conflicts of interests that may result in increased benefit to himself.  Such transactions would constitute a breach of the trustee’s duty of loyalty, may expose the trustee to personal liability, and may be voided by the beneficiaries.  See Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 170 cmt. b.

Moreover, a trustee’s duty of loyalty also requires the trustee to “communicate to [all beneficiaries] all material facts” in connection with the administration of the trust.  Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 170.  Failure to inform beneficiaries of important decisions or material facts may not only constitute a breach of the duty of loyalty, but frequently creates feelings of distrust toward the trustee.  It is important, therefore, for the trustee to remain transparent, and adequately inform all beneficiaries during the course of the trust administration.

As stated above, the duty of loyalty is broad and requires the trustee to regularly ensure that he is acting solely in the best interest of the beneficiaries.  Because the trust relationship places the beneficiary’s property under the control of the trustee, the danger inheres that a trustee has the opportunity to misappropriate the property for his or her own personal advantage. The duty of loyalty, which forbids that behavior, is an essential principle of trust fiduciary law.  It is wise for any trustee to step back occasionally to make sure that his or her actions as trustee are taken in accordance with the duty of loyalty, and ultimately that the trust is being administered solely in the interest of the beneficiaries.

https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2017-09-11 10:03:152017-09-11 10:03:15Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty: Which Interest is Best?

Fiduciary Law Blog Archive

NOTE: This blog is no longer an active blog. For the foreseeable future, we will not be contributing content. However, we continue to offer the already published content as a service to anyone interested in the topics Holland & Hart’s Trust & Estates team covered here.

Trust & Estate Litigation Practice

Holland & Hart has one of the premiere trust and estate litigation practices in the Mountain West Region. We offer legal services in the areas of probate, trust, and fiduciary litigation, and provide customized solutions to fiduciaries with the intent of avoiding future litigation. Our team represents trustees, financial institutions, trust companies, beneficiaries, creditors, agents under powers of attorney, and individuals in probate, trust, and fiduciary disputes. As part of a full-service law firm, we can also provide streamlined coordination with attorneys in other related disciplines to provide maximum efficiency and effectiveness. Click here to read more.

Categories

  • Administration Expenses
  • Administration of Estate
  • Administration of Trust
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Arbitration
  • Bonds
  • Charities
  • Conservator
  • Court Procedures
  • Elder Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Discretion
  • Fiduciary Duties
  • Fiduciary Litigation
  • Guardian
  • Legislation
  • Life Insurance
  • Mediation
  • Personal Representative
  • Powers of Attorney
  • Removal of Fiduciary
  • Settlement of Controversies
  • Surcharge of Fiduciary
  • Taxes
  • Testamentary Capacity
  • Testamentary Intent
  • Trust Litigation
  • Trustee
  • Uncategorized
  • Undue Influence
  • Will & Trust Construction

Archives

Blog Authors

Desta Asfaw
Margot Edwards
Jody Hall
Richard Kiely
Andrew LeMieux
Megan Meyers
Peter O’Brien
Kami Pomerantz
Helen Rogers
Carol Warnick

About the Firm

Holland & Hart is a full-service law firm with locations in 14 offices. Throughout the Mountain West, from coast to coast and beyond, Holland & Hart provides clients with sharp legal counsel from a vantage like no other. For more information, visit www.hollandhart.com or on Twitter: @HollandHart.

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright - Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
Link to: Good News for Surviving Spouses Seeking to Elect Portability Link to: Good News for Surviving Spouses Seeking to Elect Portability Good News for Surviving Spouses Seeking to Elect Portability Link to: Fifty Ways to Leave Your Lover (or Fifty Ways to Plan, Administer and Litigate Estates) Link to: Fifty Ways to Leave Your Lover (or Fifty Ways to Plan, Administer and Litigate Estates) Fifty Ways to Leave Your Lover (or Fifty Ways to Plan, Administer and Litigate...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top