Fiduciary Law Blog Archive
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Blog - Latest News

Possible Legislative Change for Retirement Planning

July 1, 2019/in Legislation, Taxes

by Kami Pomerantz

On May 23, 2019, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (H.R. 1994) referred to as the SECURE Act.  The SECURE Act passed with broad support in the House with a vote of 417-3.  The SECURE Act incorporates many provisions in Retirement Enhancement Savings Act of 2019 (S. 972), also known as RESA, which has extensive bipartisan support in the Senate.  Recently a small group of Senators blocked passage of RESA in an attempt to allow 529 Plan funds (educational savings account funds) to be used to support home-schooling.  However, due to generally strong bipartisan support in the Senate and House as well as retirement plan industry support, it is expected that some form of RESA will ultimately pass, the two bills will be reconciled, and that the reconciled bill will become law. 

The SECURE Act makes it easier for many Americans to save for retirement.  Most of the provisions provide more flexibility to employers and reduce administrative costs regarding creation and implementation of employer related retirement plans.  It is hoped that these reforms will allow employers to create more robust retirement plans and to encourage their employees to participate in such plans. 

Although the SECURE Act’s focus is on employer related retirement plans, there is one provision that would have a significant impact on the transfer of qualified retirement plan assets upon death.  Currently, beneficiaries who inherit IRAs and other qualified retirement plan assets can elect to receive distributions from those plans over their remaining lifetimes.  This is often referred to as the “stretch provision.”  Thus, under the current law, a beneficiary who inherits qualified retirement plan account benefits must withdraw a minimum required distribution (“MRD”) from the account annually.  The beneficiary may withdraw more than the MRD from the account; but is subject to penalties if the beneficiary withdraws less than the MRD.  All distributions from such plans (other than Roth IRAs or Roth 401Ks) are subject to income tax as ordinary income in the year distributed. 

The MRDs are determined based on the life expectancy of the beneficiary at the death of the decedent.  Thus, younger beneficiaries, such as a decedent’s children, who inherit qualified retirement plan assets may withdraw funds over a long period of time, deferring realization of income tax and allowing assets in the plan to continue to grow income tax free.  For example, a 50 year old who inherits retirement plan benefits can withdraw those benefits over 34 years.  In addition, the MRDs are not uniform over the period but rather increase as the beneficiary ages.  Thus, with a 50 year old beneficiary, the beneficiary must withdraw only 1/34th of the account value in the first year after inheriting the retirement benefits, allowing the remaining assets in the account to continue to grow.  Each year, the beneficiary must increase the numerator of the fraction by one; thereby increasing the MRD.  It is true that those who inherit qualified retirement plan accounts with a modest amount of funds often liquidate them quickly.  However, those who inherit accounts with higher balances benefit from the income tax deferral allowed by the stretch provisions.

The SECURE Act would change the system regarding the stretch provisions.  Instead of allowing a beneficiary to withdraw MRDs over his or her lifetime, the SECURE Act requires a beneficiary to withdraw all of the assets in the inherited qualified retirement plan within 10 years of the decedent’s death.  For many beneficiaries of qualified retirement plans with significant balances, this will accelerate withdrawals from a qualified retirement plan and accelerate the realization of ordinary income tax on the plan assets.  In addition, the beneficiary will lose the ability to continue to invest the qualified retirement plan assets income tax free over his or her lifetime. 

The SECURE Act does allow for certain exceptions to the 10-year rule.  If the beneficiary is the decedent’s spouse, he or she can continue to “rollover” the benefits into his or her own account and will be treated as the owner.  In addition, there are exceptions for beneficiaries who are minor children of the decedent, disabled, chronically ill or less than 10 years younger than the decedent.  For minor children, the 10 year payout period does not begin until the child reaches the age of majority.

Since the Senate has not passed RESA, it remains to be seen how the MRD rules will be changed for beneficiaries of qualified retirement plans after the death of the recipient.  However, those with large qualified retirement plan account balances should pay attention to these changes and, if enacted, consider whether any adjustment to their designated beneficiaries is warranted.

https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2019-07-01 09:36:302019-07-01 09:36:30Possible Legislative Change for Retirement Planning

Fiduciary Law Blog Archive

NOTE: This blog is no longer an active blog. For the foreseeable future, we will not be contributing content. However, we continue to offer the already published content as a service to anyone interested in the topics Holland & Hart’s Trust & Estates team covered here.

Trust & Estate Litigation Practice

Holland & Hart has one of the premiere trust and estate litigation practices in the Mountain West Region. We offer legal services in the areas of probate, trust, and fiduciary litigation, and provide customized solutions to fiduciaries with the intent of avoiding future litigation. Our team represents trustees, financial institutions, trust companies, beneficiaries, creditors, agents under powers of attorney, and individuals in probate, trust, and fiduciary disputes. As part of a full-service law firm, we can also provide streamlined coordination with attorneys in other related disciplines to provide maximum efficiency and effectiveness. Click here to read more.

Categories

  • Administration Expenses
  • Administration of Estate
  • Administration of Trust
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Arbitration
  • Bonds
  • Charities
  • Conservator
  • Court Procedures
  • Elder Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Discretion
  • Fiduciary Duties
  • Fiduciary Litigation
  • Guardian
  • Legislation
  • Life Insurance
  • Mediation
  • Personal Representative
  • Powers of Attorney
  • Removal of Fiduciary
  • Settlement of Controversies
  • Surcharge of Fiduciary
  • Taxes
  • Testamentary Capacity
  • Testamentary Intent
  • Trust Litigation
  • Trustee
  • Uncategorized
  • Undue Influence
  • Will & Trust Construction

Archives

Blog Authors

Desta Asfaw
Margot Edwards
Jody Hall
Richard Kiely
Andrew LeMieux
Megan Meyers
Peter O’Brien
Kami Pomerantz
Helen Rogers
Carol Warnick

About the Firm

Holland & Hart is a full-service law firm with locations in 14 offices. Throughout the Mountain West, from coast to coast and beyond, Holland & Hart provides clients with sharp legal counsel from a vantage like no other. For more information, visit www.hollandhart.com or on Twitter: @HollandHart.

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright - Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
Link to: Reminder – Mandatory Notice Provisions in CUTC Link to: Reminder – Mandatory Notice Provisions in CUTC Reminder – Mandatory Notice Provisions in CUTC Link to: Best Practice Tip: TPP Memos Link to: Best Practice Tip: TPP Memos Best Practice Tip: TPP Memos
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top