Fiduciary Law Blog Archive
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Blog - Latest News

Fiduciary Duty to Elect Portability

May 22, 2017/in Administration of Estate, Court Procedures, Fiduciary Discretion, Fiduciary Duties, Personal Representative, Testamentary Intent

by Matthew Skotak

The Oklahoma Supreme Court recently upheld a ruling that has required the Personal Representative of an Estate to take the necessary steps to transfer the deceased spousal unused election (DSUE) to the surviving spouse. The case stems from the rights created by the federal gift and estate tax laws regarding portability.  More specifically, beginning in 2010 one spouse was allowed to transfer, at death, his or her unused gift and estate tax exemption to the surviving spouse. Prior to 2010, each spouse had his or her own gift and estate tax exemption, but any portion of that exemption which remained unused by the spouse at death could not be transferred to the surviving spouse.

In In re Estate of Vose, 390 P.3d 238 (Okla. 2017), the Personal Representative of the Estate, one of the children of the decedent by a prior marriage, had refused to make the required election for transfer even though the surviving spouse agreed to pay the cost required to prepare the necessary Federal Estate tax return to do so.

The court rejected the personal representative’s argument regarding the surviving spouse’s standing, stating that effectively the right to portability of the DSUE was a beneficial interest in the estate for the surviving spouse, independent of the surviving spouse’s rights as an heir. This right to portability was an interest sufficient to give the surviving spouse standing to bring the claim.

The estate next argued that the parties’ premarital agreement constituted a waiver by the surviving spouse of any rights to the estate making a portability election. The court found that the right to portability only arose under the law in 2010, well after the premarital agreement had been made by the parties in 2006. Even though the court found that the parties intended a comprehensive waiver of their marital rights under law as it existed at the time of the premarital agreement, the court concluded that the agreement simply did not address portability because it was not part of the tax law at that time.

Ultimately, the court upheld the lower court’s determination that the fiduciary obligations of the personal representative to preserve the assets of estate applied, and required him to preserve and transfer the decedent’s unused federal estate tax exemption to the surviving spouse.

In rejecting these objections, the Oklahoma Supreme Court pieced together several statements implying the existence of a fiduciary duty, though the opinion does not expressly claim to establish a general fiduciary duty to make a portability election in all cases. Thus, for those with an existing Premarital or Postmarital Agreement, especially those executed before 2010, the failure to address the transfer of unused gift and estate tax exemption between spouses at death could result in paying a purchase price or initiating litigation to obtain the deceased spouse’s unused estate tax exemption, like the surviving spouse in this case.

https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2017-05-22 10:18:222017-05-22 10:18:22Fiduciary Duty to Elect Portability

Fiduciary Law Blog Archive

NOTE: This blog is no longer an active blog. For the foreseeable future, we will not be contributing content. However, we continue to offer the already published content as a service to anyone interested in the topics Holland & Hart’s Trust & Estates team covered here.

Trust & Estate Litigation Practice

Holland & Hart has one of the premiere trust and estate litigation practices in the Mountain West Region. We offer legal services in the areas of probate, trust, and fiduciary litigation, and provide customized solutions to fiduciaries with the intent of avoiding future litigation. Our team represents trustees, financial institutions, trust companies, beneficiaries, creditors, agents under powers of attorney, and individuals in probate, trust, and fiduciary disputes. As part of a full-service law firm, we can also provide streamlined coordination with attorneys in other related disciplines to provide maximum efficiency and effectiveness. Click here to read more.

Categories

  • Administration Expenses
  • Administration of Estate
  • Administration of Trust
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Arbitration
  • Bonds
  • Charities
  • Conservator
  • Court Procedures
  • Elder Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Discretion
  • Fiduciary Duties
  • Fiduciary Litigation
  • Guardian
  • Legislation
  • Life Insurance
  • Mediation
  • Personal Representative
  • Powers of Attorney
  • Removal of Fiduciary
  • Settlement of Controversies
  • Surcharge of Fiduciary
  • Taxes
  • Testamentary Capacity
  • Testamentary Intent
  • Trust Litigation
  • Trustee
  • Uncategorized
  • Undue Influence
  • Will & Trust Construction

Archives

Blog Authors

Desta Asfaw
Margot Edwards
Jody Hall
Richard Kiely
Andrew LeMieux
Megan Meyers
Peter O’Brien
Kami Pomerantz
Helen Rogers
Carol Warnick

About the Firm

Holland & Hart is a full-service law firm with locations in 14 offices. Throughout the Mountain West, from coast to coast and beyond, Holland & Hart provides clients with sharp legal counsel from a vantage like no other. For more information, visit www.hollandhart.com or on Twitter: @HollandHart.

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright - Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
Link to: Identity Theft Isn’t Just for the Living Link to: Identity Theft Isn’t Just for the Living Identity Theft Isn’t Just for the Living Link to: IRS Rules on Tax Impacts of Trust Modification Link to: IRS Rules on Tax Impacts of Trust Modification IRS Rules on Tax Impacts of Trust Modification
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top