Fiduciary Law Blog Archive
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Blog - Latest News

Premarital Agreements and the Second (Third, or Fourth . . .) Marriage

February 16, 2015/in Administration of Estate, Legislation, Will & Trust Construction

By Megan Meyers

For couples who marry later in life or who have children from a prior relationship, Premarital Agreements often incorporate waivers of spousal rights at death to ensure that previously created wealth is protected for children, grandchildren and charitable endeavors.  As Premarital Agreements continue to increase in popularity and acceptance for these couples, we have found there to be a fairly consistent misunderstanding common among clients – that is the relationship between the Premarital Agreement and the Will (or Revocable Trust). 

Many clients initially view the Premarital Agreement and the Will as interchangeable documents with similar contractual qualities and are primarily focused on the Premarital Agreement in the event of divorce.  Clients often do not initially understand the importance of including provisions in the Premarital Agreement regarding obligations at death between spouses, and simply state “we plan to just take care of that in our Wills”. 

We have found that it is extremely important to carefully walk through the differences between the Premarital Agreement and the Will with our clients.  Specifically, it is important to discuss that the Premarital Agreement is a contractual document which sets the minimum obligations that each spouse has to the other in the event of death, whereas the Will can be but one of many vehicles used to satisfy these Premarital Agreement obligations and which can provide additional benefits to the less-propertied spouse.  It is also important to note that the Will and other estate planning documents are changeable and in the full discretion of the other spouse during the marriage (provided that waivers of spousal rights are included in the Premarital Agreement).

Related to this issue of Premarital Agreement versus Will is that of the expectations and understanding of any adult children from a prior marriage.  These children may incorrectly view themselves as third party beneficiaries of the Premarital Agreement.  In other words – that the limitations on spousal rights at death which are included in the Premarital Agreement are limits that cannot be exceeded and that all other assets are protected for the benefit of the adult children from the first marriage.  While not all clients want to share these discussions with their adult children, it is important to ensure that clients understand that the Premarital Agreement merely sets the floor in terms of the obligations between spouses at death and that additional gifts may be made in the estate plan without any need to amend the Premarital Agreement.

The Premarital Agreement versus Will discussion also ties to the inevitable issues of capacity for these clients – particularly those who marry again later in life.  We have found that it is helpful to discuss and make explicit the expectations of these clients as to whether an agent or guardian appointed for the incapacitated spouse – particularly, the adult child – should have the authority to (i) amend or revoke the Premarital Agreement or (ii) pursue a dissolution of marriage action during a client’s incapacity. 

https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2015-02-16 09:00:002015-02-16 09:00:00Premarital Agreements and the Second (Third, or Fourth . . .) Marriage

Fiduciary Law Blog Archive

NOTE: This blog is no longer an active blog. For the foreseeable future, we will not be contributing content. However, we continue to offer the already published content as a service to anyone interested in the topics Holland & Hart’s Trust & Estates team covered here.

Trust & Estate Litigation Practice

Holland & Hart has one of the premiere trust and estate litigation practices in the Mountain West Region. We offer legal services in the areas of probate, trust, and fiduciary litigation, and provide customized solutions to fiduciaries with the intent of avoiding future litigation. Our team represents trustees, financial institutions, trust companies, beneficiaries, creditors, agents under powers of attorney, and individuals in probate, trust, and fiduciary disputes. As part of a full-service law firm, we can also provide streamlined coordination with attorneys in other related disciplines to provide maximum efficiency and effectiveness. Click here to read more.

Categories

  • Administration Expenses
  • Administration of Estate
  • Administration of Trust
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Arbitration
  • Bonds
  • Charities
  • Conservator
  • Court Procedures
  • Elder Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Discretion
  • Fiduciary Duties
  • Fiduciary Litigation
  • Guardian
  • Legislation
  • Life Insurance
  • Mediation
  • Personal Representative
  • Powers of Attorney
  • Removal of Fiduciary
  • Settlement of Controversies
  • Surcharge of Fiduciary
  • Taxes
  • Testamentary Capacity
  • Testamentary Intent
  • Trust Litigation
  • Trustee
  • Uncategorized
  • Undue Influence
  • Will & Trust Construction

Archives

Blog Authors

Desta Asfaw
Margot Edwards
Jody Hall
Richard Kiely
Andrew LeMieux
Megan Meyers
Peter O’Brien
Kami Pomerantz
Helen Rogers
Carol Warnick

About the Firm

Holland & Hart is a full-service law firm with locations in 14 offices. Throughout the Mountain West, from coast to coast and beyond, Holland & Hart provides clients with sharp legal counsel from a vantage like no other. For more information, visit www.hollandhart.com or on Twitter: @HollandHart.

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright - Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
Link to: Trustees Take Heed: Arizona Adopts the Fiduciary Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege Link to: Trustees Take Heed: Arizona Adopts the Fiduciary Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege Trustees Take Heed: Arizona Adopts the Fiduciary Exception to Attorney-Client... Link to: Mediator’s Moment – Beginning at the End of the Matter Link to: Mediator’s Moment – Beginning at the End of the Matter Mediator’s Moment – Beginning at the End of the Matter
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top