Fiduciary Law Blog Archive
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Blog - Latest News

Colorado’s New Law on Mandatory Reporting of Elder Abuse Goes into Effect July 1, 2014

May 5, 2014/in Legislation

by Elizabeth Meck

Colorado’s new mandatory reporting of elder abuse law will require certain helping professionals to report any suspected or observed abuse or exploitation of an elderly individual to law enforcement within 24 hours.  The bill was signed into law on May 16, 2013 and takes effect on July 1, 2014.  The bill, as a result of an elder abuse task force established to develop the legislation, makes Colorado the 48th state to have mandatory reporting legislation on the books. 

Under prior law, certain professionals were encouraged to make reports of any suspected or known abuse of an at-risk adult, defined as a vulnerable individual due to mental or physical disability or aged 60 years or older.  The new law incorporates several modifications and additions to the existing law.  Specifically, it adds the definition of an at-risk elder as an individual over the age of 70 and increases the age of an at-risk adult to 70 years or older.  Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 18-6.5-102(2)-(3).  It also clarifies the definitions of crimes against at-risk adults or elders to include undue influence resulting in conversion and caretaker neglect.  Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 18-6.5-103(6), (7.5).  Further, the new law sets forth the reporting and response requirements, mandating that not only must the initial report be filed within 24 hours of the suspected abuse, but also that the law enforcement agency must provide notice of the report to the appropriate county agency within 24 hours of the report.  Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-6.5-108(2)(b). 

The exhaustive list of helping professionals mandated to report under the new law includes a wide variety of professions such as health care professionals, pharmacists,  psychologists and mental health care providers, social workers, long-term care providers, clergy members, law enforcement officials and personnel, court-appointed guardians and conservators, and certain financial professionals.  See Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-6.5-108(1)(b)(I)-(XVIII).  An individual who fails to report under the statute or one who knowingly files a false report commits a Class 3 misdemeanor.  Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 18-6.5-108(1)(c), (4).  Upon filing a good faith report, a reporting individual is immune from any related civil action, unless he or she is the alleged perpetrator of the abuse or exploitation.  Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-6.5-108(c)(3). 

In order to raise awareness among the public and the reporting professionals, the Colorado Department of Human Services was required to implement an awareness program by January 1, 2014.  Colo. Rev. Stat. § 26-1-105.  Further, to prepare law enforcement officers to recognize and respond to incidents of elder abuse and exploitation, the Department of Law’s Peace Officer Standards Training board (“P.O.S.T.”) was required to implement training standards and programs by January 1, 2014; and, as of January 1, 2015, local law enforcement agencies will be required to employ at least one peace officer  who has completed the training.  Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-31-313.   No later than December 31, 2016, the Colorado Department of Human Services shall prepare a comprehensive report to assess implementation of the new law.  Colo. Rev. Stat. § 26-3.1-110. 

While attorneys are not on the list of professionals mandated to report, they will certainly come into contact with individuals who meet the definition of at-risk elders as well as professionals required to report.  This should cause us all to be increasingly alert and mindful of the provisions set forth in the new law.

https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://fiduciarylawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2014-05-05 09:33:442014-05-05 09:33:44Colorado’s New Law on Mandatory Reporting of Elder Abuse Goes into Effect July 1, 2014

Fiduciary Law Blog Archive

NOTE: This blog is no longer an active blog. For the foreseeable future, we will not be contributing content. However, we continue to offer the already published content as a service to anyone interested in the topics Holland & Hart’s Trust & Estates team covered here.

Trust & Estate Litigation Practice

Holland & Hart has one of the premiere trust and estate litigation practices in the Mountain West Region. We offer legal services in the areas of probate, trust, and fiduciary litigation, and provide customized solutions to fiduciaries with the intent of avoiding future litigation. Our team represents trustees, financial institutions, trust companies, beneficiaries, creditors, agents under powers of attorney, and individuals in probate, trust, and fiduciary disputes. As part of a full-service law firm, we can also provide streamlined coordination with attorneys in other related disciplines to provide maximum efficiency and effectiveness. Click here to read more.

Categories

  • Administration Expenses
  • Administration of Estate
  • Administration of Trust
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Arbitration
  • Bonds
  • Charities
  • Conservator
  • Court Procedures
  • Elder Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Discretion
  • Fiduciary Duties
  • Fiduciary Litigation
  • Guardian
  • Legislation
  • Life Insurance
  • Mediation
  • Personal Representative
  • Powers of Attorney
  • Removal of Fiduciary
  • Settlement of Controversies
  • Surcharge of Fiduciary
  • Taxes
  • Testamentary Capacity
  • Testamentary Intent
  • Trust Litigation
  • Trustee
  • Uncategorized
  • Undue Influence
  • Will & Trust Construction

Archives

Blog Authors

Desta Asfaw
Margot Edwards
Jody Hall
Richard Kiely
Andrew LeMieux
Megan Meyers
Peter O’Brien
Kami Pomerantz
Helen Rogers
Carol Warnick

About the Firm

Holland & Hart is a full-service law firm with locations in 14 offices. Throughout the Mountain West, from coast to coast and beyond, Holland & Hart provides clients with sharp legal counsel from a vantage like no other. For more information, visit www.hollandhart.com or on Twitter: @HollandHart.

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright - Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
Link to: Should an undue influencer be responsible for paying the legal fees incurred to rectify the undue influence? Link to: Should an undue influencer be responsible for paying the legal fees incurred to rectify the undue influence? Should an undue influencer be responsible for paying the legal fees incurred... Link to: Colorado’s New Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act Link to: Colorado’s New Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act Colorado’s New Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top